Are all versions of the WRT54G Ok to be used as a client?
WRT54G in client mode
- Login to post comments
Are all versions of the WRT54G Ok to be used as a client?
Air-Stream Wireless thanks our community supporters:
Aspitech | Internode Systems | Thirty4 Interactive | Parkside Primary School
wrt54g as a client: broadcom radio
The level of support is fairly limited with the broadcom chipset as you have to used propritary drivers without source. So they can do a few flakey things.
On top of that they arent the most senstive chipsets.
I dont think the radio changed that much between versions
http://wiki.openwrt.org/TableOfHardware its just a broadcom intergrated radio
so your question should really be: which version of wrt54g run OpenWRT
and I think the current choice is the WRT54GL which is designed for open firmware
but I would be happy to be corrected
here are docs on how to do client mode
http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Configuration#head-7126c5958e237d603674b3a9739c9d23bdfdb293
http://wiki.openwrt.org/ClientModeHowto
http://martybugs.net/wireless/openwrt/client.cgi
for a bridge
http://woz.gs/wifi/openwrtbridge.html
Member since 2002
Client/Admin of Ridleyton AP
Router: 10.121.0.2
LAN range: 10.104.0.0/27
lenny.hodge.wan 10.104.0.27
http://home.hodge.net.au
Sorry, that was a confusing
Sorry, that was a confusing post
To run in client mode you need to replace the firmware on the wrt54g with OpenWRT or DD-WRT
so you need a version that supports OpenWRT
once OpenWRT or DD-WRT is installed you can use it in client mode sucessfully, regardless of the version of hardware, as they all use the same wireless hardware so the driver is common to all wrt54g hardware revisions
There is a client on the ridleyton AP with over 12 months of solid connection using a OpenWRT hardware revision 1.1 in client mode at a distance of around 1km, with partial los.
so it can work with any version you can flash to OpenWRT or DD-WRT firmwares
the following links will tell you about compatibility
http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Linksys/WRT54G?highlight=%28CategoryModel%29
http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Linksys/WRT54GL?highlight=%28CategoryModel%29
http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Supported_Devices
sam
Member since 2002
Client/Admin of Ridleyton AP
Router: 10.121.0.2
LAN range: 10.104.0.0/27
lenny.hodge.wan 10.104.0.27
http://home.hodge.net.au
Thanks for the reply would
Thanks for the reply would the WAP54G be a better option.
I have been looking at whats available here http://whirlpool.net.au/index.cfm?a=h_models
WAP vs WRT
if it can run openwrt it will be no problem
i think the wap is a cut down lesser version of the wrt
its the wrt, minus all the routing functions
it looks like it is on http://wiki.openwrt.org/TableOfHardware
so it should work
version 1 and 1.1 use minipci broadacom radios, might be able to put in a more powerful card :D
but the later revisions use the same broadacom integrated radio the wrt uses so i cant see it being an issue
- should work
for any distance link (>3km) i would thoroughly recommend a more powerful radio
my 2c :)
Seabird
for any distance link (>3km)
for any distance link (>3km) i would thoroughly recommend a more powerful radio
Ok what is on offer as far as more powerful units that will do the job?
I dont know if I can do what I want within Airstream or weather I need to setup my own wifi to create a private connection between myself and my daughters house over a distance of 4.5km
WRT54g client mode ...
Hi Hawk, I have one of these little guys and it works a trea as an AP.
However, I have had a number of problems with it as a client.
I could not get it to associate with the AP unless it was very close or had a strong signal. ie, no help while waiving a
21dBi grid at AP and expecting to get your wrt to associate.
I was running OpenWRT RC5.
I believe that RC6 and Kamakaze have better support in
client mode...
My R100 on the other hand works a lot better =)
Also the R100s are better in 802.11b adhoc mode =D
cheers,
Kim
~ I've made my WRT54G an AP for local access ...
R100s to be links
How about the WRT54GL ... ?
Just thinking about it, maybe the WRT54GL is a better device?
http://www.shopbot.com.au/p-19292.html
They are still available, where as the WRT54G is EOL.
Some stats;
http://whirlpool.net.au/index.cfm?a=h_view&model_id=452
WRT54GL is a good one, but a dedicated wifi card is better
You will be able to put linux on it pretty easy
but if you want the best, try a routerboard, for about $150 + card
then you can choose a radio that is best suited to the job as opposed to the broadcom, which honestly is a -18dBm, radio with about -80dBm sensitivity at 1Mb
compared with minipci cards which are -23dBm with -95dBm sensitivity at 1Mb
and it is the bottom end of sensitivity that seperates the men from the boys, the broadcom is well in the kiddy zone.
you might have to run routerOS as opposed to busybox based linux, but doesnt really matter, all you need to do is propagate route table and get packets from A to B
for example
http://www.wifiproducts.com.au/product.asp?pID=37&cID=19
then you put in an atheros based card like a CM9, Ubiquiti SR2/SR5 and you have a 802.11a unit beaming out
Member since 2002
Client/Admin of Ridleyton AP
Router: 10.121.0.2
LAN range: 10.104.0.0/27
lenny.hodge.wan 10.104.0.27
http://home.hodge.net.au